About
Animal Architecture is an online project broadly concerned with the role of ecology and biology in architecture.
Animal Architecture:
…is a project about what it means as an animal to make and delineate space.
…is a project about the fashion, obsession, and fetishism of nature.
…is not a project about the homes, holes, caves, nests, hives, burrows, or tunnels that animals already architect.
…is a project devoted to bridging the humanist divide between “us” and “them.”
…is a project born from the belief that the history of Architecture is a humanist history and guilty of relegating all other species of life to the status of second-class beings. What makes us so special anyway?
Some principles and definitions of Animal/Architecture:
1) What is an Animal?
As Derrida would claim, “Human” is merely the name that a particular section of the animal population has given itself the right to give itself. In a similar vein, “Animal” is the term we give to anything that is not us, human that is. Therefore this website will never take “Animal” literally or at face value; and more often than not, will interpret it in its broadest sense. So when we talk about Animal we’re talking about everything from squirrels, and cats, to mitochondria, bacteria, and ecosystems in general.
2) What is Architecture?
Just as “animal” has been broadened so will “Architecture.” With Architecture we’re getting at more than just the brick-and-mortar version of human production and thinking more about systems of organization.
3) Animal Architecture:
Animal Architecture, in a very simple and general sense follows some basic patterns. Almost across the board we can say that animal architecture is:
- Highly Structurally Redundant (bone, termite hills, swallow nests)
- Relatively Unplanned (ant tunnels, bee hives coral reefs)
- Dynamic, requiring constant upkeep and maintenance
- Generally Inefficient in its use and distribution of materials
- and follows simple structural logic ie. Material at hand, + force of gravity + method of construction = form. We can see this in conk shells, oyster reefs, termite hills, and yes, beaver dams.
4) This Website, Animal/Architecture:
Will cross the human/animal divide by demonstrating, discussing, and exploring the intersection — the at times literal edge between humans and everything else around them. Architecture, as our historical defense against outside forces will be the fulcrum to open this debate. What happens when we no longer view ourselves to be separate from the world around us? Keep checking back to see what we find out.
5) Bio’s:
Animal Architecture is a online project curated by Ned Dodington and Jonathon LaRocca. Ned (resume available here) has a Masters Degree in Architecture from Rice University, Houston TX, an Art History Degree from Carleton College as well as a particular and obvious interest in ecologically aware architecture. His written and design work has appeared in AD Magazine, Texas Architect, Manifold, Plat, Bracket (“On Farming” and “Goes Soft”) and yearly publications from both Rice and Columbia University. He has been invited to jury reviews at Rice, Pratt and Columbia, was awarded the Mitchel Traveling Fellowship in 2007 and a Rice Design Alliance Grant in 2010. His work has been shown in private and group shows in both Houston and Minnesota. Comments can be directed to his attention at (animalarchitecture at gmail.com). He appreciates links, stories, projects and helpful tips.
Jon received his Masters of Architecture degree from Rice University in 2007. He completed his undergraduate education at Cornell University in 2003, earning a Bachelor of Science in Design & Environmental Analysis. He was a 2006 Margaret Everson Fossi Fellowship and 2007 Rice Design Alliance Initiatives for Houston Grant recipient, and spent time traveling to Australian urban farms for research as part of those awards. As a designer, he is committed to using a broad-based and diverse set of social science and design methodologies to understand how the planning, design, and management of the built environment affects individuals, groups, organizations, and communities, and how this knowledge can feed the imagination to generate innovative design solutions to pressing social and cultural issues. Through his work on sustainable design and development, he is also committed to examining and developing designs that contribute to the health of the environment as well as those inhabiting it.










Ned,
I read your comment re Betsky’s observations on Green Architecture. Provocative and curious. So, I took your invitation and visited AnimalArchitecture.org. Very nice site and great topics. I have many reactions to the premise and the projects presented – sympathetic, but opposing. I support your quest to explore, perhaps obliterate, the distinction between Human and Animal. But, I think, from a largely differing perspective. I don’t believe any such seperation exists. In fact, I fear that our current cultural communal fascination with technology is promoting this thesis that we are desperately growing ever more seperated from the world beyond our own skin; and that modern technology (personal computers?), will bring us to a higher plane of consciousness, a comfortable, accommodating fit, a place of happiness without decay. The problems we face, the ones we’ve created, and the solutions we explore are not new and thus don’t require new technologies to comprehend or solve. The numbers game is certainly our essential modern challenge, and to that computers present new tools. I’ll offer that a modern comprehension of our being and our space can be best achieved by taking a hold of the essentials of our existence. Start with “knowing” the soil, and let’s work from there. I noted your interest in encouraging constructive debate (the logic of high rise farming). I look forward to future postings.
Mark
Mark,
Thank you for your time and comment. Above all, I believe that constructive debate holds the key to progress. I suppose that on the topic of the potential for technology to aid or hinder human development — only time will tell, but that I for one am skeptical of our current as you say “communal fascination.” I would rather see us get smarter about using the tools we have, than revel in the glow of technology per-se. As for your comment about happiness without decay, I’m a bit confused about whether you see this as a good or bad thing, or something that is a simple inevitability. For me, this sounds like a problem, any life with out decay sounds like some kind of purgatory (mythology rarely depicts immortality in a kind light), or not life at all. As to your last point of “knowing” the soil I couldn’t agree more and I hope that you continue to keep us in mind and visit us for future postings and discussion.
Thanks.
Hi, I was not able to find a contact email. Our local AIA chapter held an Humane society shelter design competition, and our entry was this project, (at link) which was designed for feline species. It is constructed of Steel and Carbon Composites. Please check it out.
http://www.carbonfiberarchitecture.com/2008/08/first-tangible-product-inhabitant-proof.html
Ben,
Thanks for the comment. The project looks very interesting and we will be sure to check it out more thoroughly. As for contact we do prefer comments to posts (just like you did) but emails can be sent to animalarchitecture at gmail.com (we spell out the “@” here to limit spam. Please reinsert the ampersand in the actual email.)
Dear Ned an Jonathon!
Love your website and investigation with great example-projects! In fact, I would like to write my thesis about it! Do you have some recommendations literature for me, which I can read and use for my research?! Maybe great (interior) architects who follow a lot of biological design? (sorry my Englisch isn’t that great!)
Thank you very much!
Bianca